The domain of narrative crafting often walks a delicate line, where truth and deception interplay incessantly, ultimately leading to a distortion of facts.
The perplexing dichotomy lies at the core of many societal issues, as it grants manipulative individuals the power to reshape their identities, distorting the course of justice, and provoking moral dilemmas. Some may argue that narrative crafting is primarily an instrumental and creative art, rendering it innocent of any accusations. This article however, emphasises the compelling evidence against such assertions, contending that narrative crafting, when employed to post-rationalise one’s actions and project a facade of innocence, can perpetuate harmful consequences (Burke, A., 2020).
An examination of the intricacies of narrative crafting elucidates how this technique can be exploited. It encompasses the selective re-creation of past occurrences to evoke a particular emotional impact in the recipient. To this end, the craftsman may amplify certain aspects whilst downplaying or omitting others, thereby twisting facts to paint a favourable picture (Charon, R., 2006). [^1^]. Consequently, the truth becomes almost unrecognisable, the guilt hidden beneath layers of artfully contrived innocence.
Consequently, the truth becomes almost unrecognizable – Emergent research provides ample verification of this manipulation.
74 Million People Still Believe President 44 is The Sitting President
Haidt’s social intuitionist model suggests that individuals generally decide on an action based on emotional intuition and then use logic to justify it post-hoc. Interestingly in many instances, the crafted narrative becomes the dominant narrative (Haidt, J., 2001). [^2^]. Hence, the narrative craftsman is not just innocent in their eyes but also often in the eyes of the broader society.
For further insight into this artifice, consider, as a case study, the narration of political discourse, where facts are frequently twisted to fit the preferred reality.
By manipulating the narrative, politicians are known to absolve themselves from culpidity,
projecting an image of innocence. Utilising the narrative fallacy, they seamlessly blend half-truths and blatant falsehoods, shaping public opinion (Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., 2010). [^3^]. projecting an image of innocence. Utilising the narrative fallacy, they seamlessly blend half-truths and blatant falsehoods, shaping public opinion (Nyhan, B., Reifler, J., 2010). [^3^]. This manipulation of narrative crafts serves as a potent reminder of the power of crafted stories in obfuscating facts and presenting the guilty as innocent.
The utilisation of narrative crafting in the judicial context further exemplifies this issue. Defence lawyers often use narrative crafting to cast doubt on the prosecution’s version of events (Bennett, W., Feldman, M., 1981).[^4^]. The “alternative story” strategy is commonly employed, reshaping perceptions, and enabling the guilty to evade justice. This manipulation of the judicial narrative underscores the unparalleled significance of vigilance in the interpretation of narrated events.
It is important to stress that narrative crafting is not intrinsically malevolent. Indeed, it is a powerful tool for expression, empathy and connection – a fundamental human instinct. However, its misuse poses significant societal challenges, distorting reality and questioning the ideals of honesty and fairness. Greater awareness and scrutiny must be employed to differentiate between genuine narratives and those manipulated to serve self-interest, especially when these have wider implications on the society (Emery, N. J., Clayton, N. S., 2004).[^5^].
The intricate web of narrative crafting is clearly a double-edged sword. Although it can foster connections and understanding, it also conceals the potential for substantial manipulation and deception. The guilty are not always as they appear; often, they are hidden behind
a façade of crafted innocence. It is crucial, then, to scrutinise the narratives presented to us, dissecting the stories, and questioning the reliability of the narrator.
See video below – The video serves as an example of what narrative crafting – Pay attention to the language
He sent a fake text message to make it seem like they were not together
He did everything he could to distance himself from it
He also sent messages to make it appear Tharp he killed herself
He sent text messages basically saying don’t kill yourself
He sent text messages basically saying don’t hurt yourself like you threatened to do so that would make us believe that she was Suicidal